April 19, 2025

Three Secrets to Building Influence with any Money or Policy Decisionmaker in Your World

Three Secrets to Building Influence with any Money or Policy Decisionmaker in Your World

There has never been a time when the influence of nonprofit leaders was more needed. In particular, we need to have influence with the money and policy decision makers that hold the power to help or harm the people we serve.

At the same time, a lot of things are happening that could leave a nonprofit leader feeling pretty vulnerable and powerless. Our challenge is to find a way to move like water and create that influence no matter what else is going on. 

One of the things I hear most frequently from nonprofit leaders I work with is some version of, we can't get XYZ critical decision maker to listen to us. We've tried everything and we can't get through to them. We either can't get them to listen, or we can't get access to them, or both. And then what happens is folks just kind of give up on those decision makers or resign themselves to not being able to have influence with them.

I get how that happens, but what's that costing you? If these are money and policy decision makers that matter, can you afford not to have influence with them? Is that really an option?     

 

In this episode, we share:

  • The two biggest problems most nonprofit leaders have in getting access to the right decisionmakers, and how to solve them
  • How past experience with decisionmakers can lead you to the wrong conclusions about influence building – and how that gets in your way
  • How to train your subconscious brain to seek out and funnel influence-building opportunities to you
  • How to craft messaging that will really land with a decisionmaker, and motivate them to work with you
  • What it really means to speak the decisionmaker’s language, and why it makes such a huge difference
  • How to know when it’s time to switch tactics and build influence another way

 

I'm preparing to launch a group coaching program that will focus specifically on helping you craft messaging that will shift decisionmakers’ perspectives and get them on board with sustaining and even expanding your funding. This will be a coaching opportunity for a limited number of people to come in and be part of a group. There'll be some training, but most of it will be coaching and helping you to get your messaging dialed in so that you can address this pressing need.  

What I'm seeing right now is there's nothing more important than this. If that sounds like something you'd like to be a part of, message me through the podcast website or on LinkedIn

 

Links:

Episode 67 -- Three Keys to FInding the Right Decisionmaker in any System

 

WEBVTT

00:00:00.050 --> 00:00:02.600
You're listening to the Nonprofit Power Podcast.

00:00:02.600 --> 00:00:09.410
In today's episode, we share three secrets to building influence with any money or policy decision maker in your world.

00:00:09.410 --> 00:00:10.939
So stay tuned.

00:00:10.939 --> 00:00:26.019
If you want to have real and powerful influence over the money and policy decisions that impact your organization and the people you serve, then you're in the right place.

00:00:26.019 --> 00:00:26.050
I.

00:00:26.050 --> 00:00:39.460
I'm Kath Patrick, and I've helped dozens of progressive nonprofit leaders take their organizations to new and higher levels of impact and success by building powerful influence with the decision makers that matter.

00:00:39.460 --> 00:00:52.630
It is possible to get a critical mass of the money and policy decision makers in your world to be as invested in your success as you are, to have them seeking you out as an equal partner and to have them.

00:00:52.630 --> 00:00:55.490
Bringing opportunities and resources to you.

00:00:55.490 --> 00:00:58.189
This podcast will help you do just that.

00:00:58.189 --> 00:01:01.640
Welcome to the Nonprofit Power Podcast.

00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:08.019
Hey there folks.

00:01:08.019 --> 00:01:10.989
Welcome to another episode of the Nonprofit Power Podcast.

00:01:10.989 --> 00:01:12.549
I'm your host, Kath Patrick.

00:01:12.549 --> 00:01:20.924
I'm so glad you're here for today's episode because there has never been a time when the influence of nonprofit leaders was more needed.

00:01:20.924 --> 00:01:31.224
In particular, we need to have influence with the money and policy decision makers that hold the power to help or harm the people we serve.

00:01:31.224 --> 00:01:39.233
At the same time, a lot of things are happening that could leave a nonprofit leader feeling pretty vulnerable and powerless.

00:01:39.233 --> 00:01:47.073
Our challenge is to find a way to move like water and create that influence no matter what else is going on.

00:01:47.073 --> 00:01:58.826
One of the things I hear most frequently from nonprofit leaders I work with is some version of we can't get X Y Z critical decision maker to listen to us.

00:01:58.826 --> 00:01:59.996
We can't get through.

00:01:59.996 --> 00:02:03.147
We've tried everything and we can't get through to them.

00:02:03.147 --> 00:02:08.032
We either can't get them to listen, or we can't get access to them or both.

00:02:08.032 --> 00:02:17.211
And then what happens is folks just kind of give up on those decision makers or resign themselves to not being able to have influence with them.

00:02:17.211 --> 00:02:21.558
I get how that happens, but what's that costing you?

00:02:21.558 --> 00:02:28.669
If these are money and policy decision makers that matter, can you afford not to have influence with them?

00:02:28.669 --> 00:02:30.334
Is that really an option?

00:02:30.334 --> 00:02:39.643
If there's a money or policy decision maker that's important to you, that you haven't been able to get through to and build influence with.

00:02:39.643 --> 00:02:44.637
There are three possible reasons for that, one or more of which can be true at the same time.

00:02:44.637 --> 00:02:53.372
Number one, you haven't landed on the right messaging that speaks to the thing you want in a way that resonates with that decision maker.

00:02:53.372 --> 00:02:59.740
Number two, you haven't been able to get that right messaging in that decision maker's ear.

00:02:59.740 --> 00:03:02.937
And number three, you don't believe it's possible.

00:03:02.937 --> 00:03:06.526
On some level, you don't believe it's possible to do that.

00:03:06.526 --> 00:03:07.776
That's it.

00:03:07.776 --> 00:03:08.991
Those are the three reasons.

00:03:08.991 --> 00:03:19.792
When you boil down all the stuff that happens and all the struggles and the hundreds of nonprofit leaders I've worked with, and we go in and we analyze, okay, what's in the way?

00:03:19.792 --> 00:03:21.442
Why are we not able to get through?

00:03:21.442 --> 00:03:22.641
How do we fix that?

00:03:22.641 --> 00:03:30.151
When I workshop this with my clients and we create an influence building strategy and we execute on it.

00:03:30.151 --> 00:03:38.133
What I have learned is that if that hasn't already happened, what it all boils down to is one or more of those three core reasons.

00:03:38.133 --> 00:03:46.366
So that's what I want to tackle today, and I'm gonna tackle the last one first, because it actually is the most foundational.

00:03:46.366 --> 00:03:58.417
That's the part about on some level, not believing that it's actually possible to build significant influence with that decision maker or with a group of decision makers.

00:03:58.417 --> 00:04:11.157
Let me take that apart a little bit because how we come to that belief and then what happens with that belief inside our brain is really important to understand in order for us to undo it.

00:04:11.157 --> 00:04:19.932
Because as long as that belief is there, I promise you, it doesn't matter how many tactics and strategies and messaging refinement we do.

00:04:19.932 --> 00:04:27.322
It's not gonna work if you don't believe fundamentally that it's possible to build influence with that decision maker.

00:04:27.322 --> 00:04:30.112
So we gotta get at the beliefs first.

00:04:30.112 --> 00:04:49.175
So how do we wind up with the belief that either a specific decision maker or a category of decision makers, or sometimes feeling like any powerful money or policy decision maker of any kind is just we're not gonna be able to have influence with them.

00:04:49.175 --> 00:04:55.221
That belief usually comes from lived experience.

00:04:55.221 --> 00:05:04.730
The lived experience of having tried to get to one or more of those powerful decision makers, and having been ignored or rebuffed.

00:05:04.730 --> 00:05:11.110
Or you get a meeting with them and they smile and nod, but then they don't do anything and then they go ahead and do the opposite of what you wanted.

00:05:11.110 --> 00:05:19.536
All of those experiences have happened to pretty much all of us at one point or another, sometimes a lot.

00:05:19.536 --> 00:05:28.865
I've certainly had my share of experiences where I've tried a lot of different angles and just was really struggling to get through to a particular decision maker.

00:05:28.865 --> 00:05:40.062
And it is totally understandable that from that lived experience, you could come to the conclusion that, well, I guess it's just not possible.

00:05:40.062 --> 00:05:45.963
I guess we just can't build influence with this specific decision maker over here.

00:05:45.963 --> 00:05:56.471
Or if you've been rebuffed by a number of them in a particular category, well, I guess it's not possible to build influence with that type of decision maker, and so on.

00:05:56.471 --> 00:06:01.576
So that's the first part of the belief that starts to happen.

00:06:01.576 --> 00:06:06.821
And then we start to make up reasons why that is so.

00:06:06.821 --> 00:06:09.521
And so we add to the belief.

00:06:09.521 --> 00:06:26.374
We embellish the picture and we say, well, it's because powerful decision makers don't listen to people like me, or to organizations like mine, or to nonprofits in general, or to small nonprofits or to nonprofits that work on these kinds of issues.

00:06:26.374 --> 00:06:40.711
We make up all sorts of rationale and reasoning architecture for why it is that our core belief that has now been adopted that we can't influence these folks is so.

00:06:40.711 --> 00:06:47.252
Virtually all of us humans have been guilty of this at least once in our lives.

00:06:47.252 --> 00:06:54.975
And even if it wasn't with a decision maker, when we go to engage someone and we are rebuffed or ignored or pushed aside.

00:06:54.975 --> 00:06:58.192
On some level as human beings, that's painful.

00:06:58.192 --> 00:07:07.375
And so we partly adopt beliefs about why that is and what that means out of self-protection.

00:07:07.375 --> 00:07:10.105
So there's emotion bound up in this too.

00:07:10.105 --> 00:07:12.336
This is complicated stuff.

00:07:12.336 --> 00:07:16.509
But let me ask you this before we go any further with beliefs.

00:07:16.509 --> 00:07:25.290
If you don't believe fundamentally that it is possible for you to build influence with a particular decision maker or type of decision maker.

00:07:25.290 --> 00:07:30.180
What do you think the chances are that you will ever actually build that powerful influence?

00:07:30.180 --> 00:07:31.252
Right.

00:07:31.252 --> 00:07:32.761
Pretty much zero.

00:07:32.761 --> 00:07:38.086
So we have to address the belief problem before we get into anything else.

00:07:38.086 --> 00:07:41.163
Cause it's at the core and it will stop us in our tracks.

00:07:41.163 --> 00:07:42.940
And there's no need for that.

00:07:42.940 --> 00:07:47.641
I think it's very helpful to understand what's going on when we do that.

00:07:47.641 --> 00:07:52.850
We have a lived experience or a series of them that gives us information.

00:07:52.850 --> 00:07:55.920
We tried to engage X Y Z decision maker.

00:07:55.920 --> 00:07:57.704
They did not engage.

00:07:57.704 --> 00:07:59.303
We did not get what we wanted.

00:07:59.303 --> 00:08:00.639
Maybe they ignored us.

00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:01.658
Maybe they rebuffed us.

00:08:01.658 --> 00:08:07.658
They did something that we felt like, okay, we really didn't connect, or we can't even find a way to communicate with them.

00:08:07.658 --> 00:08:09.492
Sometimes it's that fundamental.

00:08:09.492 --> 00:08:12.928
So we take that information and we come to a conclusion.

00:08:12.928 --> 00:08:18.107
And this is the first problematic step in the belief construction process.

00:08:18.107 --> 00:08:22.607
We come to this conclusion and then we add all that rationale around why it's so.

00:08:22.607 --> 00:08:37.693
And what happens when we do that with our conscious thinking brain, is that that belief and all the architecture and the rationale that goes with it is transmitted to our subconscious brain, our reticular activating system.

00:08:37.693 --> 00:08:48.774
And the job of the reticular activating system is to filter out unuseful stuff and to filter in only that which we have told it is important.

00:08:48.774 --> 00:08:54.384
If we've told it something is not important or not possible, it will filter it out.

00:08:54.384 --> 00:08:56.394
That's its job.

00:08:56.394 --> 00:08:57.683
It's one of its jobs.

00:08:57.683 --> 00:08:59.844
And you think about why that is.

00:08:59.844 --> 00:09:08.639
It's even before current circumstances, the volume of input that we're all receiving every day is just insane.

00:09:08.639 --> 00:09:17.715
No human being can process all of the sensory and other inputs that we're getting every single day.

00:09:17.715 --> 00:09:21.975
So that reticular activating system's job is super important.

00:09:21.975 --> 00:09:23.924
It protects us from overload.

00:09:23.924 --> 00:09:33.606
Because if we were actually consciously thinking about every single piece of input we got all day, we wouldn't be able to focus on anything and nothing would get done, and we'd probably go crazy.

00:09:33.606 --> 00:09:37.849
So that filtration system is vital for our wellbeing.

00:09:37.849 --> 00:09:48.215
The problem is if we don't understand how it works and we're not careful with what we're teaching it, we can wind up with it doing us a huge disservice.

00:09:48.215 --> 00:09:50.554
And that's what happens in this situation.

00:09:50.554 --> 00:09:52.534
We have the lived experience.

00:09:52.534 --> 00:09:53.774
We come to a conclusion.

00:09:53.774 --> 00:09:57.044
We build the belief, and we build the rationale around it.

00:09:57.044 --> 00:10:03.054
And then the reticular activating system takes that and says, okay, boss, I got it.

00:10:03.054 --> 00:10:04.899
There is no opportunity there.

00:10:04.899 --> 00:10:12.443
We can't influence this particular decision maker or this group of decision makers or any decision makers, depending on what you've concluded.

00:10:12.443 --> 00:10:13.759
We got that now.

00:10:13.759 --> 00:10:17.200
Alright, we will filter out any input that contradicts that.

00:10:17.200 --> 00:10:24.249
It doesn't exist because we already know that what is true is that you cannot influence them.

00:10:24.249 --> 00:10:25.695
It's not possible.

00:10:25.695 --> 00:10:29.884
So why on earth would we let any input in that tries to contradict that?

00:10:29.884 --> 00:10:34.412
That's just noise and it diverts us from our core work over here.

00:10:34.412 --> 00:10:37.402
You can see how that might be problematic.

00:10:37.402 --> 00:10:45.691
On the flip side, when we teach it that there are opportunities for influence building and engagement everywhere.

00:10:45.691 --> 00:10:57.094
That you never know where the next chance to make a connection, to build influence, to pull someone a little closer in and get them on board with your stuff.

00:10:57.094 --> 00:11:09.657
If we believe that there are opportunities happening every second all the time and every one of them is a chance to build a little bit more influence and that that's vital to what we're trying to do here long term.

00:11:09.657 --> 00:11:20.937
Then what we're teaching our reticular activating system is to filter in anything that might remotely be an opportunity to engage, an opportunity to connect.

00:11:20.937 --> 00:11:26.105
And that's what we start seeing and experiencing, and then we can act on it.

00:11:26.105 --> 00:11:41.027
So the job of the reticular activating system is to both filter out what it has been told is irrelevant, and to filter in, like a laser-focused funnel, to mix a metaphor, to bring all of that in.

00:11:41.027 --> 00:11:42.803
And say, oh, look at that.

00:11:42.803 --> 00:11:43.823
Oh, there's another one there.

00:11:43.823 --> 00:11:44.933
There's another opportunity.

00:11:44.933 --> 00:11:45.714
Oh, grab that.

00:11:45.714 --> 00:11:46.134
Look at that.

00:11:46.134 --> 00:11:46.583
Look at that.

00:11:46.583 --> 00:11:47.644
They're all over.

00:11:47.644 --> 00:11:52.703
And then your conscious brain can do the work of saying, awesome.

00:11:52.703 --> 00:11:53.514
I see that opportunity.

00:11:53.514 --> 00:11:54.413
I see that opportunity.

00:11:54.413 --> 00:11:55.673
I see this other opportunity.

00:11:55.673 --> 00:11:58.586
They're not all equal, and you've got limited bandwidth.

00:11:58.586 --> 00:12:05.413
So you won't necessarily act on every opportunity that your RAS filters into you, but at least you see them.

00:12:05.413 --> 00:12:11.144
And you can make strategic decisions about which ones to pursue and which ones to maybe set aside for now.

00:12:11.144 --> 00:12:24.797
So the first thing we have to do is stop teaching our reticular activating system that this isn't possible, or that it's really hard and that the opportunities are rare.

00:12:24.797 --> 00:12:29.822
Instead, we have to teach it that the opportunities are everywhere.

00:12:29.822 --> 00:12:38.254
Every waking moment, opportunities for engagement and influence are coming at us if we know to look for them and if we're open to them.

00:12:38.254 --> 00:12:48.044
But what we often don't realize is how powerful that reticular activating system function is in determining what you see and what you notice.

00:12:48.044 --> 00:12:49.845
So that is job one.

00:12:49.845 --> 00:12:58.261
We teach the subconscious to let the good opportunities in, and to not work against us by filtering them out.

00:12:58.261 --> 00:13:03.162
And there's a more extended process that goes with doing this to make sure that that sticks.

00:13:03.162 --> 00:13:07.062
Because if you are currently in a belief that it's not possible.

00:13:07.062 --> 00:13:11.397
You can't just flip a switch and say, okay, I've decided it's possible.

00:13:11.397 --> 00:13:13.287
Now get to work reticular activating system.

00:13:13.287 --> 00:13:14.726
Bring me all the stuff.

00:13:14.726 --> 00:13:20.490
It takes a little more effort than that, but there is a well-defined process for doing that.

00:13:20.490 --> 00:13:24.210
And I teach that in my coaching programs cause it's so foundational.

00:13:24.210 --> 00:13:31.284
It requires consistent action over a period of time to train a new belief into your reticular activating system.

00:13:31.284 --> 00:13:33.999
But not only is it possible, it's foundational.

00:13:33.999 --> 00:13:45.375
I do it constantly and I'm always on the alert for, oops, Hey, have I got an unhelpful belief operating here that is not giving me what I want?

00:13:45.375 --> 00:13:49.480
And when I identify those, and there's a process for doing that too.

00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:52.299
When I identify those, I get to work on them.

00:13:52.299 --> 00:13:56.740
Because I know the process for rewiring the belief, and I just get to work on that.

00:13:56.740 --> 00:13:59.330
And say, okay, now I know the unhelpful belief.

00:13:59.330 --> 00:14:07.094
Let me identify what I need to have operating as a belief instead, that's gonna teach the RAS to send me the input that I need.

00:14:07.094 --> 00:14:11.583
There's processes for all of that, and I teach that inside my coaching programs.

00:14:11.583 --> 00:14:20.754
So first of all, you fix the belief problem and you get your RAS working with you to show you all the opportunities for engagement and influence building.

00:14:20.754 --> 00:14:24.586
Then the other two pieces are making sure your messaging is dialed in.

00:14:24.586 --> 00:14:30.897
And by dialed in, I mean that it is the right messaging for that decision maker at this time.

00:14:30.897 --> 00:14:39.346
Cause different things will work at different points in the process, or different times of political environment as we have observed right now.

00:14:39.346 --> 00:14:46.850
But the bottom line is your messaging has got to resonate with the decision maker and connect to something they care about.

00:14:46.850 --> 00:14:49.129
It needs to engage them emotionally.

00:14:49.129 --> 00:14:50.809
It needs to do a lot of different things.

00:14:50.809 --> 00:14:54.017
But we have to get our messaging right.

00:14:54.017 --> 00:15:05.154
So for starters, if we have a group of decision makers, let's say city council members or the state health department or a potential contracting partner.

00:15:05.154 --> 00:15:07.400
So first of all, those are categories.

00:15:07.400 --> 00:15:11.520
City council members are at the city level and they're elected officials.

00:15:11.520 --> 00:15:18.725
The state health department people are obviously at the state level and they are paid government agency people.

00:15:18.725 --> 00:15:28.520
And then the contracting partners could be government or they could be private enterprise, and you're liable to approach them somewhat differently based on that.

00:15:28.520 --> 00:15:30.903
So they're already fitting in categories.

00:15:30.903 --> 00:15:36.529
And just the categories they live in, influence how you design your messaging a little bit.

00:15:36.529 --> 00:15:43.730
Because what keeps an elected official up at night is a little bit different than what keeps an agency person up at night.

00:15:43.730 --> 00:15:48.379
And that's different than what keeps a private enterprise actor up at night.

00:15:48.379 --> 00:15:54.945
This is all foundational message building that I trust that you already know, but I'm revisiting for clarity.

00:15:54.945 --> 00:16:01.431
We have to understand what are the primary problems and concerns they're walking around with on a regular basis.

00:16:01.431 --> 00:16:03.217
And that's context.

00:16:03.217 --> 00:16:06.788
We're not necessarily gonna speak directly to some of those things.

00:16:06.788 --> 00:16:07.177
We might.

00:16:07.177 --> 00:16:13.426
Depends on how relevant they are, how connected they are to the thing that we're looking to have them do for us.

00:16:13.426 --> 00:16:21.120
And let me just pause for a second and say that influence goes beyond making a specific ask and getting a yes.

00:16:21.120 --> 00:16:25.080
Although that is a huge piece of it, and that's often what we're focused on.

00:16:25.080 --> 00:16:34.970
But influence also goes to, long term, helping to shape how they're thinking, helping to shape how they see the world.

00:16:34.970 --> 00:16:42.827
And helping to shape how they see us and our organizations and our role in the world.

00:16:42.827 --> 00:16:58.248
Ultimately, we're looking to be seen by them as thought leaders, as highly valuable problem solving partners, as influential in our own right, and a really good ally to have, a really good partner to have.

00:16:58.248 --> 00:17:00.653
Because we solve important problems.

00:17:00.653 --> 00:17:07.066
We show up, we deliver, we contribute to the intellectual advancement of the discussion around how we solve problems.

00:17:07.066 --> 00:17:09.556
That we're all of that in their minds.

00:17:09.556 --> 00:17:12.343
And you don't build that in a day.

00:17:12.343 --> 00:17:14.123
You build that over time.

00:17:14.123 --> 00:17:19.980
But sometimes you're at a place where you just need to get them to say yes to something.

00:17:19.980 --> 00:17:23.252
And that's all the influence you want or need right this minute.

00:17:23.252 --> 00:17:27.423
You'll work on the other stuff long term, but right here, right now, you need a thing.

00:17:27.423 --> 00:17:28.863
Totally understand.

00:17:28.863 --> 00:17:37.722
And that is more true right now probably than it has been in a while, 'cause we're facing a lot of threats and some opportunities, but the threats are looming pretty large.

00:17:37.722 --> 00:17:47.516
It's absolutely critical that the decision maker understand the problem that you solve and the level at which you solve it.

00:17:47.516 --> 00:17:51.615
And the impact it makes when you solve that problem.

00:17:51.615 --> 00:17:55.835
And that's the impact on individual people's lives in the community.

00:17:55.835 --> 00:18:09.214
But it's also the impact that you have on the financial picture for whatever world the decisionmaker is in, whether it's a city budget or a state agency budget, or a private enterprise balance sheet.

00:18:09.214 --> 00:18:16.305
You're able to communicate effectively, impact around those aspects that land for that decision maker.

00:18:16.305 --> 00:18:19.055
That means you have to learn to speak their language.

00:18:19.055 --> 00:18:25.704
This is a balancing act because you have to speak their language and it's not necessarily the same as yours.

00:18:25.704 --> 00:18:40.224
If you work in healthcare or housing or workforce development or nutrition or whatever arena you are in, there are all sorts of terms of art and acronyms and this that, and the other that are shorthand language.

00:18:40.224 --> 00:18:46.942
And you cannot assume that the decision maker you're communicating with shares that language.

00:18:46.942 --> 00:18:47.932
They may.

00:18:47.932 --> 00:18:53.333
And if they do, you're in great shape because then you can kind of nerd out together in your shared language.

00:18:53.333 --> 00:18:56.663
And That has an influence building component all its own.

00:18:56.663 --> 00:19:04.208
But you also have to speak all of their language about ROI and balance sheets and so on.

00:19:04.208 --> 00:19:13.060
When you are able to effectively speak to them in their native language, whatever it is, your influence and credibility go way up.

00:19:13.060 --> 00:19:17.670
And so that's not even about the general focus of the messaging.

00:19:17.670 --> 00:19:20.339
That's about the delivery and the engagement process.

00:19:20.339 --> 00:19:24.869
It says to them, without ever saying this out loud, I get you.

00:19:24.869 --> 00:19:26.279
I know what you're dealing with.

00:19:26.279 --> 00:19:35.460
I can speak your language, and the reason I can speak your language is I understand the problems you're dealing with, and I've got solutions for the problems you are dealing with.

00:19:35.460 --> 00:19:41.788
Now those solutions also solve other problems that that decision maker may or may not be concerned with.

00:19:41.788 --> 00:19:48.807
But you have to be able to align the work that you do with how it solves a problem the decision maker cares about.

00:19:48.807 --> 00:19:56.915
And you have to be able to frame it in the language that the decision maker would use to describe that problem.

00:19:56.915 --> 00:19:58.891
This is core.

00:19:58.891 --> 00:20:09.315
You could be saying conceptually the same thing, but if you're not saying it in the language that the decision maker would use themselves, they may or may not get it.

00:20:09.315 --> 00:20:15.825
They may or may not understand that you just offered to solve one of the most pressing problems they have.

00:20:15.825 --> 00:20:19.125
Because you said it in a language that wasn't familiar to them.

00:20:19.125 --> 00:20:26.125
So we have to make sure that all of our messaging is doing that in all the different spheres of decision making.

00:20:26.125 --> 00:20:29.173
And this is a process of continuous testing.

00:20:29.173 --> 00:20:40.001
The basic process for it is you take everything that you've heard that decision maker say, or you can look online to find places where they have spoken or have written things.

00:20:40.001 --> 00:20:45.955
Whatever you can gather to learn how they talk about the problem you solve.

00:20:45.955 --> 00:20:52.882
The more of that you can gather the better, because it helps you shape your initial messaging as close to how they would talk about it as you can.

00:20:52.882 --> 00:20:57.465
And then you will engage and you will get more feedback.

00:20:57.465 --> 00:21:01.155
You will learn more things as you actually talk with them.

00:21:01.155 --> 00:21:05.051
And hopefully you'll develop the skill of adjusting your language in real time.

00:21:05.051 --> 00:21:09.721
And one of the simplest tricks for that is to just repeat back to them what they just said.

00:21:09.721 --> 00:21:21.739
Because then they hear their words coming outta your mouth and that tells them that you heard them, you got it, and you are integrating it into your thinking.

00:21:21.739 --> 00:21:25.338
And that is a key part of how you build influence.

00:21:25.338 --> 00:21:26.645
Sure.

00:21:26.645 --> 00:21:31.308
Some influence is grounded in just straight up money and power.

00:21:31.308 --> 00:21:32.509
I have lots of money.

00:21:32.509 --> 00:21:33.499
I have lots of power.

00:21:33.499 --> 00:21:34.848
Do what I say.

00:21:34.848 --> 00:21:42.048
And there's a certain subset of decision makers who will be influenced by that and who will say, yep, okay, well then I guess that's what I better do.

00:21:42.048 --> 00:21:49.964
Fortunately, there are a lot of other ways to cultivate influence that aren't about having a lot of money and power.

00:21:49.964 --> 00:21:59.034
And those are the ways that we need to cultivate because with just a few exceptions, most nonprofits aren't going around with lots of money and power.

00:21:59.034 --> 00:22:03.335
There are a few, but you know, most of us are not operating from that place.

00:22:03.335 --> 00:22:09.048
So we have to use all the other strategies for influence building that aren't grounded in that.

00:22:09.048 --> 00:22:10.186
Okay.

00:22:10.186 --> 00:22:16.969
And then the last piece is you've developed the right messaging, you know how you're gonna talk to them, you have done your framing.

00:22:16.969 --> 00:22:22.104
And then you've gotta figure out how to get that effective messaging in that decision maker's ear.

00:22:22.104 --> 00:22:25.659
And there are usually two pieces to this problem.

00:22:25.659 --> 00:22:30.878
One is sometimes you don't actually know who the specific decision maker is.

00:22:30.878 --> 00:22:32.709
We run into this a lot.

00:22:32.709 --> 00:22:34.838
It's like, well, it seems kind of vague.

00:22:34.838 --> 00:22:36.699
You can't really tell who's in charge.

00:22:36.699 --> 00:22:38.318
I don't know.

00:22:38.318 --> 00:22:44.479
And it seems kind of opaque, and we kind of feel like that might be deliberate, and all of that.

00:22:44.479 --> 00:22:46.118
That can certainly happen.

00:22:46.118 --> 00:22:48.638
Opaque decision making structures are a thing.

00:22:48.638 --> 00:22:50.689
Sometimes it's deliberate.

00:22:50.689 --> 00:22:55.053
I actually did a whole episode on this a while back, episode 67.

00:22:55.053 --> 00:23:00.268
Where I talked about how you build a decision making roadmap when it's not immediately clear.

00:23:00.268 --> 00:23:02.989
There's a bunch of strategies you can use for that.

00:23:02.989 --> 00:23:10.001
And if you are interested in how to go deep on that particular aspect of this, I encourage you to go listen to that episode.

00:23:10.001 --> 00:23:12.184
And I'll link that up in the show notes for you.

00:23:12.184 --> 00:23:15.097
So first you have to know who the decision maker is.

00:23:15.097 --> 00:23:17.244
And then you need a way to get to them.

00:23:17.244 --> 00:23:23.454
The answer a lot of times for both of those is to find the bridge or bridges.

00:23:23.454 --> 00:23:29.827
That's the first place I always ask people to start is, who do you know who has a relationship with that decision maker?

00:23:29.827 --> 00:23:35.548
Or who has influence with them or just even knows them at all.

00:23:35.548 --> 00:23:40.961
Or if you're trying to find your way in, who do you know who can be your local guide?

00:23:40.961 --> 00:23:46.561
And this can be, I mean, I've had lots of clients who've been very successful going in at a very low level.

00:23:46.561 --> 00:23:49.478
You know, I have a relationship with a caseworker over there.

00:23:49.478 --> 00:23:52.218
Or I have a relationship with a receptionist.

00:23:52.218 --> 00:23:53.238
Okay, cool.

00:23:53.238 --> 00:23:54.468
Ask them.

00:23:54.468 --> 00:23:57.015
Ask them how that place works.

00:23:57.015 --> 00:23:58.005
Who's in charge of this?

00:23:58.005 --> 00:23:59.355
Who's in charge of these decisions?

00:23:59.355 --> 00:24:01.125
Who's actually running the show over there?

00:24:01.125 --> 00:24:05.451
It might or might not be whose name is in that spot on the org chart.

00:24:05.451 --> 00:24:06.817
It could be.

00:24:06.817 --> 00:24:15.958
But a lot of times there are gatekeepers and decision makers that are very important to have influence with, that are not immediately obvious.

00:24:15.958 --> 00:24:19.208
So you need a local guide, you need a bridge.

00:24:19.208 --> 00:24:24.218
Somebody who knows that system or those individuals or both.

00:24:24.218 --> 00:24:27.575
And can first of all tell you who's the right person.

00:24:27.575 --> 00:24:32.231
And then once you know who's the right person, you can then say, okay, who do we know?

00:24:32.231 --> 00:24:35.561
Who do we know who has any connection to them at all?

00:24:35.561 --> 00:24:41.307
And sometimes it'll be a pretty tenuous connection, and other times it'll be oh wait.

00:24:41.307 --> 00:24:43.057
I bet this person on our board knows them.

00:24:43.057 --> 00:24:44.017
They're in the same industry.

00:24:44.017 --> 00:24:44.567
You know what?

00:24:44.567 --> 00:24:45.616
I bet they probably do.

00:24:45.616 --> 00:24:46.936
Let me ask.

00:24:46.936 --> 00:24:54.446
And then you go to ask the board member and they say, well, no, I don't know Suzy Q, decision maker, but I do know their boss.

00:24:54.446 --> 00:24:55.386
Oh.

00:24:55.386 --> 00:24:56.811
Well, that would be good.

00:24:56.811 --> 00:24:58.071
We would take that.

00:24:58.071 --> 00:24:59.422
That would be very helpful.

00:24:59.422 --> 00:25:01.748
You can always find a bridge.

00:25:01.748 --> 00:25:08.458
Sometimes you have to look pretty hard and look under a bunch of rocks, and sometimes it's a quick, easy connection.

00:25:08.458 --> 00:25:10.887
But keep at it because it's there.

00:25:10.887 --> 00:25:12.387
There will always be a bridge.

00:25:12.387 --> 00:25:17.974
One of the awesome superpowers of nonprofit leaders is that we are connection builders.

00:25:17.974 --> 00:25:21.394
And so we already have tons of connections throughout the community.

00:25:21.394 --> 00:25:28.595
I promise you, you know somebody who knows the decision maker you need to get to and they will help you get there.

00:25:28.595 --> 00:25:30.484
But you have to ask.

00:25:30.484 --> 00:25:33.607
And this goes back to that belief thing.

00:25:33.607 --> 00:25:41.630
If you don't believe that you can have influence, what are the chances that you'll reach out to that bridge and ask them to make an introduction?

00:25:41.630 --> 00:25:43.730
Ask them to connect you in some way.

00:25:43.730 --> 00:25:46.063
Or even just give you advice.

00:25:46.063 --> 00:25:50.048
You can say to them, Hey, we wanna work with such and such decision maker.

00:25:50.048 --> 00:25:52.877
We can't figure out how to connect with them.

00:25:52.877 --> 00:25:56.248
We've tried, kind of cold emailing and that's obviously going nowhere.

00:25:56.248 --> 00:25:57.238
No surprise.

00:25:57.238 --> 00:25:58.807
But how well do you know them?

00:25:58.807 --> 00:25:59.917
What is your suggestion?

00:25:59.917 --> 00:26:03.624
What would be the best way for us to make a connection here?

00:26:03.624 --> 00:26:08.248
And that person you're talking to might say, well, that's a really good question.

00:26:08.248 --> 00:26:08.698
I don't know.

00:26:08.698 --> 00:26:10.891
I know a couple of other people who might know that.

00:26:10.891 --> 00:26:11.941
Let me go ask them.

00:26:11.941 --> 00:26:15.300
And then they come back to you and they come back with more intel and you build on that.

00:26:15.300 --> 00:26:17.488
And eventually you find your way in.

00:26:17.488 --> 00:26:26.786
All of this, all of influence building and advocacy, all of it is about making connections.

00:26:26.786 --> 00:26:31.976
Fundamentally, it is making connections from one human to another human.

00:26:31.976 --> 00:26:41.212
And there's no human too powerful, too rich, too whatever, that we can't find a way to make a connection.

00:26:41.212 --> 00:26:45.318
Now, sometimes it's not worth the trouble.

00:26:45.318 --> 00:27:02.226
If there is a decision maker who has made it clear in every way possible that they hate the thing you work on, that they despise the people you serve, that they have no interest in solving the problem you solve.

00:27:02.226 --> 00:27:05.165
And furthermore, they wish it would all be defunded.

00:27:05.165 --> 00:27:13.195
Then that's not a decision maker that it's worth your time to go connect with them and build a relationship.

00:27:13.195 --> 00:27:19.085
That's a case where the influence you may be able to have is through pressure.

00:27:19.085 --> 00:27:22.453
That's a whole other topic that I'm not gonna tackle today.

00:27:22.453 --> 00:27:31.070
But right now, in the environment we're in, especially with members of Congress, pressure is the way to go in a lot of situations.

00:27:31.070 --> 00:27:33.753
But that's a topic for another day.

00:27:33.753 --> 00:27:48.840
Today I am focusing on building influence through connection and through the right messaging and through making sure that your belief structure that is guiding your reticular activating system.

00:27:48.840 --> 00:27:54.179
Making sure that it's filtering in opportunities for connection and not filtering them out.

00:27:54.179 --> 00:28:02.878
If you nail those three pieces, I promise you your ability to build influence will go way up pretty fast.

00:28:02.878 --> 00:28:05.147
Influence is the name of the game.

00:28:05.147 --> 00:28:07.584
We've gotta be able to engage these decision makers.

00:28:07.584 --> 00:28:09.203
We've gotta be able to get them on board.

00:28:09.203 --> 00:28:15.461
We need as many of them as possible helping us as much as possible, particularly in the current environment we're in.

00:28:15.461 --> 00:28:18.574
And I'd like to help you go even deeper on that.

00:28:18.574 --> 00:28:28.433
In the next few weeks, I'll be launching a group coaching program that will tackle exactly the essential messaging and influence building issues that every nonprofit is facing right now.

00:28:28.433 --> 00:28:43.682
This will create an opportunity for a limited number of people to come in and be part of a group where there'll be some training, but most of it will be coaching and helping you to get your messaging dialed in so that you can address these pressing needs.

00:28:43.682 --> 00:28:48.268
If that sounds like something you'd like to be part of, go ahead and shoot me a message.

00:28:48.268 --> 00:28:54.417
You can reach out to me through the podcast website or the LinkedIn page, and I'll drop those links in the show notes.

00:28:54.417 --> 00:28:58.857
I'm still designing this so I don't have all the details for you right this second.

00:28:58.857 --> 00:29:02.337
But I wanna put that out there because I think this is so important.

00:29:02.337 --> 00:29:06.298
In the meantime, this is a strategic framework for you to work from.

00:29:06.298 --> 00:29:15.448
And the most important thing is to always remember that you can build influence with those money and policy decision makers that matter most.

00:29:15.448 --> 00:29:17.127
Never doubt that.

00:29:17.127 --> 00:29:23.038
Thanks for listening, and I'll see you in the next episode right here on the Nonprofit Power Podcast.